"Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is it vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished, as the once vital voice of the verisimilitude now venerates what they once vilified. However, this valorous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition. The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose vis-à-vis an introduction, and so it is my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V."

Sunday, March 21, 2010

How does writing an argument compare/contrast with speaking (or yelling) one? Look at Perry's schema of cognitive development and place your self in that schema. Write about your spot in Perry's schema and how this might relate with project 2.

Writing an argument requires more planning than speaking one. Although it gives one more time to prepare the argument, more time to react to opposing views, etc, the opponents also have this advantage, and more becomes expected of both of you

As for Perrys Schema, I'm not exactly sure what we're supposed to do with that. I'll do a larger post on it, after we discuss it more in class.
Posted by at

1 comment:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)